|
Diagnosis and monitoring
Diagnosis of diabetes
In the United Kingdom, diagnosis of diabetes
follows the criteria published by the World Health
Organisation (WHO) in 1999.
Because of its relatively rapid onset and the
frequency of clinical symptoms, type 1
diabetes is unlikely to go undiagnosed.
- In the presence of symptoms (thirst,
frequent urination, unexplained weight
loss, drowsiness or - in extreme cases -
coma), a glucose level in whole venous
blood in the non-fasting state greater
than 10.0 mmol/L is sufficient to
establish a diagnosis of diabetes.
- Confirmatory testing with an oral
glucose tolerance test (see below) is
only required if the blood glucose level
is in the uncertain zone of 4.4 - 10.0
mmol/L (whole venous blood), 4.4 -
11.1 mmol/L (whole capillary blood).
- The diagnostic criteria in children are
the same as for adults.
- Severe hyperglycaemia under
conditions of acute infective, traumatic,
circulatory or other stress may be
transitory, and is not in itself
diagnostic of diabetes.
Type 2 diabetes is more likely to go
undiagnosed if onset is slow and symptoms absent
or minimal, when they may be missed, or
attributed to another cause.
There is at present no established national
screening programme for type 2 diabetes. And
unless there is a suspicion motivated by family
history that someone has diabetes, the diagnosis
may first be suggested by the finding of
hyperglycaemia during a blood test for some
other purpose.
The WHO states that “The diagnosis of
diabetes in an asymptomatic subject should never
be made on the basis of a single abnormal blood
glucose value”, and so a second, confirmatory test
on a separate occasion will be needed. This is
most usually a blood glucose determination done
on a sample taken after overnight fasting, or the
oral glucose tolerance test.
The oral glucose tolerance test
This test is carried out after at least three days of
unrestricted diet and usual physical activity.
After an evening meal containing 30-50g of
carbohydrate, the subject fasts overnight (min. 8
hours). On the following morning, a fasting blood
sample is taken and the subject consumes a drink
containing 75g of glucose. A second blood sample is taken exactly two hours later.
| Glucose concentrations for diagnosis of diabetes and other categories of hyperglycaemia |
| |
Whole blood mmol/L |
Plasma mmol/L |
| |
Venous |
Capillary |
Venous |
Plasma mmol/L
Fasting or
2hours post-glucose |
≥ 6.1
≥ 10.0 |
≥ 6.1
≥ 11.1 |
≥ 7.0
≥ 11.1 |
Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT)
Fasting (if measured) and/
2hours post-glucose |
< 6.1 and
≥ 6.7 |
< 6.1 and
< 7.8 and |
≥ 7.0 and
≥ 7.8 |
Impaired Fasting Glycaemia (IFG)
Fasting
and (if measured)
2hours post-glucose
|
< 5.6 and
≥ 6.1
≥ 6.7
|
< 5.6 and
≥ 6.1
< 7.8
|
≥ 6.1 and
≥ 7.0
≥ 7.8 |
|
Gestational diabetes is diagnosed using the
oral glucose tolerance test, usually at 24-28 weeks
after conception. Subjects meeting WHO criteria
for diabetes or IGT are classified as
having gestational diabetes.
Monitoring and self-management
Once diabetes (or IGT or IFG) has been
diagnosed, it is important to monitor blood
glucose level on an ongoing basis, since tight
control of blood glucose decreases the risk of
developing long-term complications in both type 1
and type 2 diabetes.
Measurement of the level of glycosylated
haemoglobin (HbA1C) in the blood gives a good
indication of the average blood glucose level over
the previous 2-3 months. An individual target level
will be set by the doctor, taking into account any
known risk factors for complications. Guidelines
recommend that this target level should be set in
the range 6.5 to 7.5 per cent, with lower
values in people with risk factors for
complications. However, with certain treatments,
lower values are associated with a greater risk of
experiencing hypoglycaemia, and so a balance
must be found. It is important that HbA1C levels
are tested regularly, and current guidelines state
that this should be at least twice a year and up to
six times, depending on how much the person's
condition varies. The test is available through a
clinician, or a commercially available test kit at a
retail pharmacy.
Monitoring average blood glucose levels with
HbA1C is not sufficient for good management of
the disease, as there may still be large short-term
variations after meals, for example, that can have
damaging consequences. This is particularly likely
in type 1 diabetes; by contrast, levels in type 2
diabetes tend to show less variation.
Short-term monitoring is most conveniently carried
out by the patient as a part of self-management,
and education will be offered where self-testing is
thought to be appropriate.
The simplest form of self-testing is to use glucosesensitive
dipsticks to measure glucose in the urine.
However, values measured in urine show a poor
match with blood levels. Also, this method does
not give a warning of developing hypoglycaemia.
Its use is usually restricted to type 2 diabetes
treated with agents that do not provoke
hypoglycaemia and where the individual is not able or willing to carry out the more usual pinprick
blood testing.
Most people find they can measure glucose levels
in capillary blood, obtained by pricking a
finger with a small lancet or needle. A small drop
of blood is obtained and spotted onto a reagent
strip. Originally, the test strips changed colour to
indicate the glucose concentration and the result
was then read either manually or by a meter. As
many people with diabetes have poor eyesight,
newer meters detect glucose by electrochemical
means, with the results displayed on a clearly
readable screen.
Many people use the finger-prick method of blood
sampling successfully over many years, but a noninvasive
method of testing would be preferable if it
were sufficiently accurate. Various devices have
been tried, but none has yet proved entirely
satisfactory.
One commercially available device, worn around
the wrist like a watch, uses a small electric current
to draw out fluid from the skin to test its glucosecontent with a sensor. However, the glucose level
in this fluid can differ significantly from that in
blood, and the instrument requires careful
calibration, using the finger-prick method, each
time a new sensor is fitted. Hence, it is not yet a
truly reliable, non-invasive monitoring alternative to
blood sampling, although it may be useful as
a complement.
|