Home Search Contacts Help
ABPI - The Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry
 
AMRIC - Animals and Medicines Research Information Centre

Development of medicines

Researching New Medicines.

Clues about the nature of illness and possible avenues of prevention or treatment come from many sources. Doctors' experience with patients, world-wide patterns of disease, research on living cells and tissues as well as fundamental research with mammals, fish and reptiles and even insects and plants all provide pieces of a giant jigsaw puzzle. The understanding that leads to medical progress depends on being able to put these often seemingly unrelated pieces together.

Once researchers have a theory, they must test its value, because even the most promising theories often prove to be wrong. Despite big advances in the understanding of how our bodies work, many aspects of even our most basic body processes remain a mystery. As our own biology has so much in common with that of other animals, research with animals has taught us things we could not have discovered in any way, other than by experimenting directly in humans.

Modern research and development of new medicines uses the most up-to-date technology

From the earlier research, scientists may believe that a particular type of compound could be a useful medicine for a particular illness. Then the long process of research and development begins, usually taking about 12 years. For many medicines, computers have revolutionised the early stages because they can design thousands of variations of molecules quickly and work out which ones have promise based on what is already known about various types of chemical structures.

Computers are also an essential tool because they are used, in conjunction with state-of-the art robotic systems, to search huge 'libraries' of compounds for any that might have helpful biological activity - for instance, ones that react with a particular protein involved in a particular illness.

Armed with the information from computers, scientists select compounds that must then be tested. Some of this work can now be done on cells in the test tube. The effect of the compounds on these isolated cells gives some indication of their usefulness. Those compounds that are obviously going to ineffective or harmful are eliminated at this early stage. Only a relatively small number of compounds will get through this stage. But for those that remain, it is still early days in the research process.

Ultimately it's what happens in the whole body that counts.

In the end, however, the usefulness of a medicine will depend on less obvious effects on the whole body, not just on cells in isolation.

So new medicines have to be tried out on complete living systems, first in animals and then in people. Animals, despite obvious and not so obvious differences, have biological systems that are very similar to our own. Some have argued that the differences are too great for the use of animals to be justified. But researchers know from long experience that most effects of medicines can be seen in animal tests, provided those tests are carefully designed, properly conducted and evaluated.

Knowing this, it is hard to imagine a society that would allow medicines to go straight from the test tube into patients. It is important to note that decisions about the approval of a new medicine for doctors to prescribe are never made on the basis of animal studies alone. All medicines must eventually be tested in people, but only after those who have the responsibility of making these decisions are confident that it is safe enough to do so. If, after lengthy human trials, the benefits of a medicine significantly outweigh the risks, the Government's Committee on Safety of Medicines will recommend its approval.

Once a medicine becomes available, its use must still be monitored. The numbers of people taking it are likely to be many times greater than could ever be included in the clinical trials in patients. So it is always possible that unpredicted side effects will be seen. Usually these are minor. But very occasionally, serious problems develop. Each case is different and is carefully studied to see if there are improvements that could be made in the research process to avoid the situation in the future.

But no combination of research methods can guarantee a medicine's safety for every single person that may take it, nor that it will work for every individual. Scientists do the best they can, using a combination of all the available testing methods, to make new medicines as safe and effective as possible.

 

 

 

Researchers know from long experience that most effects of medicines can be seen in animal tests, provided those tests are carefully designed, properly conducted and evaluated.

Knowing this, it is hard to imagine a society that would allow medicines to go straight from the test-tube into patients.

 

 
All research, by its very nature, is an uncertain process but animal research helps scientists to get much closer to the human situation than would otherwise be possible.

 

 
Previous Page | Print Page | Top of Page
Copyright © ABPI - The Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy